JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 10, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Abel Antonio Vargas Montoya Y Otros Vs. Departamento Archipielago De San Andres, Providencia Y Santa Catalina Y La Policia Nacional

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo Civil Del Circuito De San Andres Isla Y El Tribunal Superior De San Andres, Providencia Y Santa Catalina. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Superior De San Andres, Providencia Y Santa Catalina
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Autoridad pública del orden nacional y departamental
  • Tribunal Superior y Consejo Superior de la Judicatura Sala Disciplinaria
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, al Tribunal Superior de San Andres, Providencia y Santa Catalina, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada por el senor Abel Antonio Vargas Montoya y otros contra el Departamento Archipielago de San Andres, Providencia y Santa Catalina, y la Policia Nacional.
  2. Informese esta decision, ademas, al Juzgado
  3. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de San Andres, Isla.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.